"It ends up you have two versions of Christianity," he said. "There are two positions that have moved apart over the last century: the Bible-based orthodox Christianity that goes back to the early years of the Church and a post-modern Christianity that believes everybody can find their own truth. And those two things cannot work together."
Here's some thoughts from the Cafe during lunch today in response:
What happens when we have a learned and empowered laity - the priesthood of all believers? Why is it so important? The bishops receive their authority from the Lord, true - but they are empowered through the trust of the laity (the clergy have to obey, theoretically - but the laity can choose, we can always go somewhere else and they know that). As the laity share in the consequences of leadership and not just the benefits, there forges a shared ministry that can have enormous impact on the Church.
The first thing you’d want to do to stop that is to keep the laity in the dark. Often we will help ourselves stay in the dark because it does take effort to stay engaged (and I don’t just mean politically - in fact, that is lesser, it’s really staying engaged in the scriptures, participating in Bible Studies and discussions and reading the Word ourselves and being impacted by the Word ourselves that is truly powerful - engaging in the structures of the Church comes from that engagement with the Scriptures and not the other way around). So the more we are equipped through the teaching of the Word and the knowledge of the polity of the Church, the more we are empowered (and held responsible) to go to work.
What has happened over the past 100 years has been the sweep of the Renewal - remember when Azusa Street Revivals broke out - as well as evangelical Bible Study. A hundred years ago people had Bibles, but did they do Bible Study? Well, perhaps the Methodists did! But how about all the rest of us - and particularly the Episcopalians and Anglicans? Think about it.
Now that we read Scriptures ourselves and read, mark, learn and inwardly digest them - and not just rely on the interpretation of the assigned clergy - it can have a rather unstabling affect on the church structures. In Virginia there was/is almost an assumption by the clerical orders that the laity do not know as much as they do about the Bible, or about Church history. Maybe we don’t speak Greek, but we may know our Bible and it’s the peril of the clerical orders to encounter a biblically literate congregation.
The Anglican crisis is born in part because of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the laity to read the Scriptures, to study the Scriptures, the pray the Scriptures, to talk about the Scriptures, and to tell others about the Scriptures outside of the clerical orders. Rowan Williams, as educated as he is, may not be used to laity reading over his scholarship and critiquing it. That’s got to be a shock. Even the clergy hesitate to do that (after all, he is a bishop), but except for the niceties ("Hey, I had a tea with the bishop!") if we can get past that and to holding our own with the Scriptures as laity it has a huge impact on the Church locally, diocesan-wide, nationally and now - as we see unfolding every day - world-wide.
We must hold ourselves back from finger pointing and ask ourselves what we know and what we are going to do with what we know. There are times when I think I’d rather just go back to Hawaii, sit on the beach, and forget about the Troubles. It can be mighty tempting. But is that what we are called to do for the long haul, especially as we suffer the same cost as the clergy and the bishops, but stand our ground, not run away, not put our heads in the sand, but persevere and press on - not for our own glory, but for the glory of Jesus who reached out to us and saved us and set us free.