BB NOTE: Thanks, Matt.
From here at StandFirm. The Executive Council of the Episcopal Church has been meeting for the past few days (and no, Ethel Merman was not there) and have now produced this statement that basically says
hell no. More later. Click the radio below and then read on ...
2 comments:
I guess the lawsuits are TECs form of "engagement with the churches of the Anglican Communion". "Deep and sincere listening"... Oh Yes, that's called Discovery!
Gotta love 'em...
OK so the request from the Primates was for Bishops to (1) not give consent to the election of people whose lifestyle was inappropriate and for Bishops to (2) say they would not allow blessing of same sex unions in their dioceses.
For a group that is so interested in asserting its authority these days, how is it that TEC has to backpedal and say "Oh my, we could never make those kinds of decisions wihthout the General Convention playing a role."
As far as I can see in the canons, Bishops are asked for their consent to the election of every bishop. They do not have to ask permission from the GenCon before saying yes or no. So what's the problem with that part of the request? Are the Bishops giving up their personal authority over this area of the church? Doesn't seem likely does it ...
As far as I can see in the canons, Bishops have the final authority for what worship services take place in their jurisdition. Are they telling me that if I started blessing chips and soda on the altar they would have to wait for a GenCon to help them decide how to discipline me? Are they suggesting that before authorizing me to perform a marriage for someone previously married they will now have to ask some committee of laypeople from around the country meeting at GenCon for permission? No. They have authority over what services are held within their dioceses. We all know that. Why can't they say it out loud?
So then ... it seems very silly for the Bishops of TEC or the Exec Council to suggest they do not have the authority to give the exact assurances requested by the Primates . They have no canonical need to ask anyone to fulfill what is canonically their personal responsibility.
Oh yeah. Duh. Sorry. I guess it's all about failing to take responsibility for your actions in the first place.
Gotta love us. The Exec Council says so.
Post a Comment