LATER: Here is a great interview with the Rev. John Yates and Dr. Os Guinness on why they left the Episcopal Church:
6 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Fr. Yates wrote, "The announcement also implies that we can no longer be considered part of the Anglican Church."
I would think that the good Rector would at least proofread more carefully -- it is the Anglican Communion not the "Anglican Church." And this is the sort of conflation of terms that confuses those outside -- you know, the ones we're trying to bring inside?
The radio program clip is very interesting. I'd encourage people to listen into the segment w/ Judge Pressler. This man actually is everything in the Baptist denomination that liberal Episcopalians would accuse members of TFC and Truro of being. He's a real life fundamentalist and his advocacy of reforming Baptist universities and seminaries has led to removal of women from teaching posts (occured this past week at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Ft Worth) and serious discussions of ripping all mentions of evolution from biology courses.
My guess is he would even call Rev Yates out for allowing women on the vestry - much less for having women preach and lead Communion.
This is not meant to be criticism of Judge Pressler, but intended to illustrate how much more room their is to the "right" of the positions taken by the parishes who've associated themselves with CANA.
Why don't we stand in a circle and just focus on what's in the center (assuming we can agree on what is in the center and don't use rhetorical devices to rename the circle a square)?
I think you're touching on Church visible verses invisible thing. Protestants use Church in ways that drive Roman Catholic nuts, lessor Eastern Orthodox. A Protestant usually would not have a problem the statement. The Anglican Communion is the proper name and you are correct, the one we should probably use to lessen confusion.
I am wondering exactly how many members of the Falls Church (and Truro Church) came from IRD (the so-called Institute on Religion and Democracy). It's apparent that their actions of late are part of IRD's agenda.
6 comments:
Fr. Yates wrote, "The announcement also implies that we can no longer be considered part of the Anglican Church."
I would think that the good Rector would at least proofread more carefully -- it is the Anglican Communion not the "Anglican Church." And this is the sort of conflation of terms that confuses those outside -- you know, the ones we're trying to bring inside?
The radio program clip is very interesting. I'd encourage people to listen into the segment w/ Judge Pressler. This man actually is everything in the Baptist denomination that liberal Episcopalians would accuse members of TFC and Truro of being. He's a real life fundamentalist and his advocacy of reforming Baptist universities and seminaries has led to removal of women from teaching posts (occured this past week at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Ft Worth) and serious discussions of ripping all mentions of evolution from biology courses.
My guess is he would even call Rev Yates out for allowing women on the vestry - much less for having women preach and lead Communion.
This is not meant to be criticism of Judge Pressler, but intended to illustrate how much more room their is to the "right" of the positions taken by the parishes who've associated themselves with CANA.
I suppose that where ever there are two or three gathered together, someone has to stand on the right.
bb
Why don't we stand in a circle and just focus on what's in the center (assuming we can agree on what is in the center and don't use rhetorical devices to rename the circle a square)?
Padre Wayne:
I think you're touching on Church visible verses invisible thing. Protestants use Church in ways that drive Roman Catholic nuts, lessor Eastern Orthodox. A Protestant usually would not have a problem the statement. The Anglican Communion is the proper name and you are correct, the one we should probably use to lessen confusion.
I am wondering exactly how many members of the Falls Church (and Truro Church) came from IRD (the so-called Institute on Religion and Democracy). It's apparent that their actions of late are part of IRD's agenda.
Post a Comment