In other news, council approved a resolution declaring “null and void” attempts by a number of dioceses to revise their constitution to qualify their accession to the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention.
“Any amendment to a diocesan constitution that purports in any way to limit or lessen an unqualified accession to the constitution of The Episcopal Church is null and void, and be it further resolved that the amendments passed to the constitutions of the dioceses of Pittsburgh, Fort Worth, Quincy and San Joaquin, which purport to limit or lessen the unqualified accession to the constitution of The Episcopal Church are accordingly null and void and the constitutions of those dioceses shall be as they were as if such amendments had not been passed,” council stated in Resolution NAC-023.
After the resolution was approved, the Rt. Rev. Stacy Sauls, Bishop of Lexington, said Episcopalians had all agreed to live by certain principles and rules and that council believed it would be “helpful to have an authoritative statement [on the matter] with respect to any litigation that might occur in the future.”
BB NOTE: ENS puts it this way: [Episcopal News Service] Episcopal Church dioceses that change their constitutions in an attempt to bypass the Church's Constitution and Canons were warned by the Executive Council June 14 that their actions are "null and void."
The Council passed Resolution NAC023, reminding dioceses that they are required to "accede" to the Constitution and Canons, and declaring that any diocesan action that removes that accession from its constitution is "null and void." That declaration, the resolution said, means that their constitutions "shall be as they were as if such amendments had not been passed."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b947/7b94758d04b780595d1276fb8664af2967ff7094" alt=""
We do wonder how long it's going to take before the Executive Council finds the Virginia Plan "null and void"? And then what?
3 comments:
But I thought only General Convention could do such a thing ;-)
Bingo!
bb
The aim is not to force ECUSA to change. That is impossible. The aim is not to force them to be nice to Christians. That is also impossible. The aim is to completely destroy ECUSA so that its destruction will be a warning to every "church" anywhere in every age about the blatant stupidity of leaving Christ. They are damned, predestined to be damned, and now must been seen to reap the fruit of damnation
Post a Comment