- The Rt. Rev James Adams, Western Kansas
- The Rt. Rev Lloyd Allen, Honduras
- The Rt. Rev David Alvarez, Puerto Rico
- The Rt. Rev John Bauerschmidt, Tennessee
- The Rt. Rev Peter Beckwith, Springfield
- The Rt. Rev Franklin Brookhart, Montana (Voted Yes on D025)
- The Rt. Rev William Frey, Rio Grande
- The Rt. Rev Dorsey Henderson, Upper South Carolina (Voted Yes on D025 and C056)
- The Rt. Rev John Howe, Central Florida
- The Rt. Rev Russell Jacobus, Fond du Lac
- The Rt. Rev Don Johnson, West Tennessee (Voted Yes on D025)
- The Rt. Rev Mark Lawrence, South Carolina
- The Rt. Rev Gary Lillibridge, West Texas
- The Rt. Rev Edward Little, Northern Indiana
- The Rt. Rev William Love, Albany
- The Rt. Rev Bruce MacPherson, Western Louisiana
- The Rt. Rev Alfredo Morante, Litoral Ecuador (Voted Yes on C056)
- The Rt. Rev Henry Parsley, Alabama (Voted Yes on C056)
- The Rt. Rev Michael Smith, North Dakota
- The Rt. Rev James Stanton, Dallas
- The Rt. Rev Pierre Whalon, Convocation of American Churches in Europe (Voted Yes on D025 and C056)
- The Rt. Rev Paul Lambert, Suffragan-Dallas
- The Rt. Rev David Reed, Suffragan-West Texas
- The Rt. Rev Sylestre Romero, Assistant-- New Jersey (Voted Yes on D025)
- The Rt. Rev John Sloan, Suffragan--Alabama (Voted Yes on C056)
- The Rt. Rev Jeffrey Rowthorn, Retired-Convocation of American Churches in Europe
- The Rt. Rev Don Wimberly, Retired-Texas
The Anaheim Statement text is here.
5 comments:
How do these people vote for something, and then sign a protest against it?
The signatures of the quislings invalidates the impact of the whole thing. Blah, blah, blah.
Only 17 out of 27 have voted consistently against the revisionism.
I would maintain that the Anaheim Statement was not that different than what the revisionists had been saying. What in this statement couldn't be spun into something V. Gene Robinson or KJS couldn't sign?
Not one 'bishopess' in that list, not a one - hmm....
Post a Comment