Monday, July 07, 2008

A word of caution to our traditionalist friends

No doubt many in the Anglican Communion who are traditionalists (i.e., see ordination in the traditional Catholic view) are lamenting the vote taken today at the General Synod of the Church of England to move forward toward the consecration of women bishops in the Church of England.

But a word of caution, friends.

For a long time, activists in the Episcopal Church sought to link "full inclusion" (which is really about the ordination and consecration and marriage of non-celibate homosexual men and women) with civil rights and women's suffrage. Linking civil rights and suffrage with what is clearly biblically immoral behavior was an embedded political strategy (see the book After the Ball) and for The Episcopal Church it worked.

There is nothing progressive activists would enjoy but to see traditionalists wig-out over the Holy Orders of women. Not only would they enjoy the spectacle, but they would also enjoy seeing a split between the evangelicals who uphold biblical equality in ministry (i.e., the priesthood of all believers and mutual submission in ministry) and the traditionalists. The fellowship between what has historically been an acrimonious engagement (it is what brought us the "broad church" in the first place and the introduction of liberation theology while the evangelicals and Anglo Catholics fought it out, the liberal wing took root) - the healing and restoration between the evangelicals and traditionalists has been one of the miracles of this movement. No one could have predicted the depth of fellowship and commitment that would spring up between evangelicals and Anglo Catholics, between Reformed and Wesleyan wings of the church. This has truly been a gift of God. There's just no other way to explain it.

So who would benefit from a massive wig-out?

It is no accident, friends, that the Church of England is wrestling with making women bishops just before Lambeth. Let me say that again, it is no accident, friends, that the Church of England is wrestling with making women bishops just before Lambeth. So before people starting wigging out and issuing ultimatums, think very seriously about who would actually gain by traditionalists wigging out right now.

Think about it. Canterbury is so lovely in July.

Rowan Williams: In the Waterless Pit

From here.

Sunday 06 July 2008

General Synod, July Group of Sessions

Any congregation might be forgiven for wondering what are we going to hear about this morning. Members of Synod in particular (but perhaps members of the Church of England in general) may have the slight sense that there's rather too much to be hearing about, that we're suffering somewhat from issue fatigue. So perhaps we ought to begin where we always ought to begin, in listening to what the Word of God has to say. And scripture says, 'Rejoice greatly, o daughter of Zion. I will set your prisoners free from the waterless pit". And today's scriptures say, 'Who will rescue me from this body of death. Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord'. And scripture says, 'Come to me all you who travail and are heavy laden. My yoke is easy and my burden is light'. In a way, the pivot for understanding all this is provided in the epistle today. Paul in the letter to the Romans gives us the key.

We live under law, different kinds of law. The law of God, which is for our health, and the law we make for ourselves. We long to be masters of our future, and so we become the prisoners of our past. We long to take control of the world we're in. And because we are who we are, and our histories have been what they have been, we dig ourselves deeper and deeper into unfreedom. The will that we want to use to conquer the world, is a will weakened and bruised by the legacy of self-love, going back to the very roots of the human race. The effects of that legacy work themselves out as relentlessly as any oriental karma. We want to take hold of our future and we are gripped, paralysed, by our past.

We find ourselves in that 'waterless pit' of which Zechariah speaks. Waterless pits - perhaps that should trigger a memory of one particular Old Testament story. Do you remember that when Joseph went in search of his brothers and they decided to kill him – they threw him into a pit where there was no water. Remember Joseph? Joseph who was so unpopular with his brothers because he believed his future was in his hands. He knew he could foresee the day that his brothers and his father would bow down to him. But he finds himself in a waterless pit, sold into slavery. God's future for him only begins to happen when he is stripped of his claim to be master of his own future. In a waterless pit the dreams fade away. There is only God over against the body of death.

So, reflecting on Joseph, we can perhaps turn back to our own moments of waterless perplexity, those times in our discipleship, individual and corporate, our discipleship as persons, our discipleship as a Church, to which we may turn back to those moments, as moments when – if we will – we can hear the Word, when – if we will – our dreams are overtaken by God's future. And how very hard it is to let go of our claims upon our own future. How very hard to accept the waterlessness of the pit, how very hard to understand that we are there in the presence of God and of death.

And so we struggle. And no doubt at all that Joseph in the first few hours struggled mentally and physically in his waterless pit and began to devise plans. And as we load ourselves down with that struggle against God and against death, we are doing exactly what Jesus in the Gospel tells us not to do. We are burdening ourselves. One of the desert fathers remarked, 'And how very easily we laid aside the yoke of Christ and burdened ourselves with the heavy yoke of self-justification' - There's a phrase to ponder – a heavy yoke of self-justification. That's the law, that's the curse. That's the waterless pit indeed - where we struggle ceaselessly, unrelentingly, to make ourselves more right, and to lay hold upon our future. We lay upon ourselves a heavy yoke, from which only the grace of Jesus Christ can deliver us. In a nutshell, we lay upon ourselves the yoke of desperate seriousness about ourselves.

And Christ's promise is so difficult because it's so simple. 'The Unbearable Lightness of Being', as the novelist says, that is what Christ offers to us: receiving it is hard. Naaman of Assyria when he came to Elisha to be healed of his leprosy, could not believe that the answer was easy. There must be something complicated for him to do. There must be some magic to be done. The word alone, 'release' is not enough. We long for, we are in love with the heavy yoke of self justification. Naaman wanted to go away from Elisha, able to say, 'Well I had some part in that – I did the difficult things the prophet asked me'. And Elisha, in the name of God, tells him to do something simple, to immerse himself in the mercy of God. And when Jesus says, "Our yoke is easy and my burden is light", that is what he says, to all of us as individuals, to us as a Synod, to us as a Church, to us as a society, to us as a human world: lay aside the obsession to possess the future, receive the word of promise, here. And that's why, as Jesus himself says in the gospel, that's why only some people really do hear the word easily - only the tax collectors and the sinners.

It's never a bad idea, during meetings of synod or indeed any other church activity, to turn your eyes occasionally – literally or metaphorically – through the windows. You might see Jesus passing by. And where is he likely to be and who is he likely to be with? The Gospel suggests very, very strongly that he's going to be first and foremost with those who do find it easy to hear the word of simple promise. Because, in their own waterless pits, they've had to let go of confidence about the future, confidence in their power. 'What would Jesus do?' is a good question to ask, but, 'Where would Jesus be?' is just as good, and, 'Who would Jesus be with?' is a question the Gospels force on our attention again and again.

In the middle of all our discussions at synod, where would Jesus be? Jesus is going to be with those who feel the waterlessness of their position: with those traditionalists feeling the Church is slipping away from them, the landmarks have shifted, and they don't know how what they've taught and heard and what they've been taught can be life-giving for tomorrow. He'll be with those in a very different part of the landscape who feel that things are closing in, that their position is under threat, that their liberties are being taken away by those anxious and eager to enforce new ideologies in the name of Christ. He would be with those who feel that their liberty of questioning is under threat, he would be with the gay clergy, who wonder what their future is in a Church so anxious and tormented about this issue.

Where will he be? He will be with those members of the Synod staff and the staff of the University of York; the people in the Press Gallery, who are trying to keep their minds on their business while dealing with any number of complex personal issues, who may be inflicted by private anxieties, griefs and losses, who will never be noticed by those who take them for granted as they go about their businesses. He will be all over the place. He will be with people we don't much want to sit with, because that's a place he always occupies. He pipes for them, and they will dance, because in their unprotected-ness they are able to meet him at a level any of us can't. Where will Jesus be? In whose company? The company of those who feel lost; have lost; and who are just beginning to see that lost-ness is the beginning of wisdom. It's in that lostness they're beginning to let go of the law that is in their members, the compulsion to take hold of and script and control their future.

Into this darkness comes Jesus to release us in our prison and make us, as the Prophet says, 'Prisoners of hope'. 'He comes to be with us so that we may be where he is' as he tells us in the fourth Gospel. 'So that we may be where he is? And where he is (he says in this morning's gospel) is in the presence of the Father; seeing and knowing that unconditional depth of love out of which he comes, to which he looks in adoration and obedience, into which by his Holy Spirit he draws us. He alone knows the Father, sees the Father, and there is no salvation but to be where He is, seeing, knowing, as He sees and knows by the gift of his Spirit. He alone rests in that eternal, unifiable life. That is why he says, 'Come to me and I will give you rest; I will give you sight; I will bring you hope.'

'My yoke is easy; my burden is light' which is why we need to be where he is, nowhere else, where he is with the Father; where he is alongside those occupying their waterless pits, oh and where he is in the waterless pits into which we, gradually, bit-by-bit are being introduced the agonies, complexities, of our life as a Christian community.

'Who shall deliver me from this body of death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord', we are delivered from the body of death by our incorporation into the body of his life; the body that is the Catholic fellowship of Christ's Church. The body that is all of us in our various waterless pits, in our corporate waterless pit of bewilderment and confusion and division today. Nonetheless, his body, his body of life, which this morning as week-by-week we take once again into our hands in the sacrament, the body of life. The body of life which makes us prisoners of hope, which takes us where he is. 'Come to me, I will give you rest. The yoke is easy and my burden is light'.

Thanks be to God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

The Bishop of Durham pulls up the drawbridge: "Not here in England!"

We have to catch the train, but a short post to draw attention to an astonishing essay has been published by the Bishop of Durham that is simply - well, unbelievable. On one hand he can't understand why no one has helped poor beligured Jim Packer (at least he's one Englishman who actually knows who Dr. Packer is), on the other hand he is convinced that what's going on in Canada and the United States has, well, nothing to do with England. Here is a quote from the Bishop of Durham's essay - including the shouting:

... the GAFCON proposals are not only not needed in England but are positively harmful and indeed offensive. This was more or less what I said on the radio last Thursday, where I distinguished carefully between the American and English situations. AS FAR AS ENGLAND IS CONCERNED, it is damaging, arrogant and irrelevant for GAFCON leaders to say, as they are now doing, ‘choose you this day whom you will serve’, with the implication that there are now only two parties in the church, the orthodox and the liberals, and that to refuse to sign up to GAFCON is to decide for the liberals. Things are just not like that. Certainly not here in England.

And then on the other hand, yesterday's General Synod was taken up with what to do about all the redundant (i.e., closed) historic churches in England (there are tons of them) and whether they should just keep them open for tourists. The inability to get it - especially from someone as esteemed at N.T. Wright - is simply astonishing. England appears to be about five years behind North America and are at the Titanic hitting the iceberg stage. No, that's not really an iceberg we just hit - no, not England. Meanwhile, All Souls Langham Place is stuffed to the rafters with his fellow Englishmen and Englishwomen who are gravely concerned that indeed that is an iceberg ahoy and one either needs to navigate around it or hit it. But my dear bishop, sticking your head in the sand and saying "not here in England," brings up images of that unfortunate prime minister, you know the one - he came just before Winston Churchill.

Read the whole thing here. It is simply astonishing. Of course, we haven't had a visit by N.T. Wright to The Falls Church since the Troubles. Wonder why he stays away? Gotta watch out for those uppity laity, you know. They can really get out of sorts - and dredging up a kind of false nationalism ("not here in England!") doesn't rise from us outrage as much as it does pity.

Sunday, July 06, 2008

Sunday Night at the Cafe: What can I do for You?



Catch especially his harmonica solo near the end. I've mentioned this before here at the Cafe, but years ago at Truro we had a guest speaker who said that the best way to deal with anxiety, i.e., to "be anxious for nothing," is to be thankful, "but in everything, give thanks ..." Dylan's composition brings it all into perspective - not what the Lord can do for us, but what can we do for Him? It's not about exhorting our own rights, but expressing our gratitude that He loved us first, that He loved us so much that He laid down His life for us - and in His accomplishments on the cross and in His resurrection, we find new life. We are set free because of what He has done for us. How can we show how much we love Him? What can we do for Him? Or as another composer put it, how can I keep from singing?

You have given everything to me.
What can I do for You?
You have given me eyes to see.
What can I do for You?

Pulled me out of bondage and You made me renewed inside,
Filled up a hunger that had always been denied,
Opened up a door no man can shut and You opened it up so wide
And You've chosen me to be among the few.
What can I do for You?

You have laid down Your life for me.
What can I do for You?
You have explained every mystery.
What can I do for You?

Soon as a man is born, you know the sparks begin to fly,
He gets wise in his own eyes and he's made to believe a lie.
Who would deliver him from the death he's bound to die?
Well, You've done it all
and there's no more anyone can pretend to do.

What can I do for You?

You have given all there is to give.
What can I do for You?
You have given me life to live.
How can I live for You?

I know all about poison, I know all about fiery darts,
I don't care how rough the road is, show me where it starts,
Whatever pleases You, tell it to my heart.
Well, I don't deserve it but I sure did make it through.
What can I do for You?

B. Dylan

Press Conference at All Souls Langham Place, London



Archbishop Peter Jensen and Archbishop Henry Orombi and Archbishop Gregory Venables meet the press following the standing-room only post-Gafcon meeting at All Souls, Langham Place in London. They make it clear that the reformation is coming from within the Anglican Communion.

Prayers for COE General Synod


Saturday, July 05, 2008

Loose Lips Sink Ships

BB NOTE: Interesting note from fellow blogger Perpetua of Carthage today. Right. On one hand Gene Robinson says it's all a big secret. Shhh ... On the other hand, he's happily blabbing away to the local San Francisco newspaper about the fact that it's all a secret. Er, heh?

Here's the bit about his upcoming secret meetings with primates at the Lambeth Conference in Canterbury - and remember, don't tell anybody.

Several primates - leaders of provinces, which play a role similar to that of the Episcopal Church in the United States - have asked to meet with him privately, and only on the condition that he never reveal that he met with them or discuss what they talked about.

It goes against Robinson's desires to hide the truth, but he's willing.

"I'm sad about that," he said. But "I will do anything to sit down with those folks and try to heal this gulf between us."

Okay, can we all breathe a sigh of relief that the Bishop of New Hampshire does not carry the codes to the President's football?

Read the whole thing here. Memento mori. Tip of the tinfoil to perpetua.

GAFCON: A Life Changing Experience


Been spending some time talking to those are now back from GAFCON in Jerusalem and hearing their amazing stories - and there are so many stories not only in their words but in their faces. They are radiant! Their stories are filled with examples of how the journey changed their lives - a simply extraordinary event, a real pilgrimage. Indeed, you can see it on the faces in this video. For every person we see - and some of the photos include over a thousand people - for every person we see there are stories of how their lives were changed in Jerusalem. What is God doing?

On a lighter note, I heard one story about a grand attempt to gather everyone together for photographs. The delegates were being asked to group themselves by province so that a photo could be taken of each province, but the delegates were so mixed in with everyone else that moving 1,200 into provinces became an effort of momentous proportions. They were having too much fun.

The first step was to get everyone's attention (a challenge in itself), then ask everyone to group themselves into provinces (which meant they had to stop talking to each other and start moving), and then they had to figure out where all the provinces were. It took a long time just to get people to listen they were having so much fun (no wonder Jesus called us all sheep) and by the time some had started to form groups, it was challenging to figure out where you actually belonged.

Cue the Australians. They came up with a brilliant idea to find all the other Aussies that were deep in the crowd enjoying themselves. Their province started to sing Waltzing Matilda and it wasn't long before all the Australians were gathered and carrying on with round after round of Waltzing Matilda. Not to be outdone, the Ugandans starting singing a Ugandan chant and it wasn't long before the entire conference was a mass of singing.

And it worked. They got the photos.

And so in honor of those innovative Australians - thank God you are here! - we offer this:

Northern Ireland Anglican Bishop expresses public concerns about Lambeth agenda

BB NOTE: Northern Ireland Bishop Harold Miller has gone public on his concerns regarding the agenda of the Lambeth Conference. While willing to give Lambeth "one more chance," at a recent Synod gathering the Diocese of Down and Dromore, the bishop expressed his dismay with Lambeth's "recasting" by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

George Conger's article at Religious Intelligence is
here. Here is an excerpt:

Dublin: Irish evangelical leader Bishop Harold Miller of Down and Dromore conceded his decision to attend the Anglican Lambeth Conference “did not make sense” in light of the agenda and invitation list put forward by the Archbishop of Canterbury, but it was important to “give it one more chance” so as to preserve the gathering’s “moral authority.”

In his Presidential Address to the Synod of the Diocese of Down and Dromore on June 19, Bishop Miller noted this month’s Lambeth Conference would be marked by the absence of a “quarter of our bishops." He was “deeply saddened” by their decision as it would undermine the “moral authority” of the Conference, as well as excluding the voices of the most vibrant churches in the Communion.

However, he also expressed concerns about the conference as planned, noting it had been recast into a “retreat-come-training-conference and a meeting and listening place for bishops.”

The agenda “bothers me,” he said, asking “Who is doing the ‘training’ and how is it going to be ‘slanted?”

He also asked what “listening” meant when the Episcopal Church “does not seem to have listened? Does it mean ‘you must keep on listening till you come round to a particular point of view?’
Read the rest here.

815 Communications Director throwing in the towel

From here. After four rather tumultuous years, Bob Williams has tendered his resignation from his post as Communications Director at 815, the office of the Presiding Bishop. He was quite a departure from his predecessor, who ran the General Convention newsrooms like Perry White.

What caught our eye here is that Bob came from the Diocese of Los Angeles and was deeply involved in the last Lambeth Conference in 1998. "As editor of the Lambeth Conference's daily newspaper in 1998, Williams gained experience that will assist in interpreting events of this summer's similar gathering in Canterbury," the 815 press release says.

But will Bob be in Canterbury during this year's Lambeth Conference? Uh, no.

"During these coming weeks," the press release states, "Williams will remain in New York to oversee ongoing Church Center communication operations through mid-August." After August 15, Bob will be free to "devote more time to family and to new pursuits."

Hmm ...

Friday, July 04, 2008

A Profile on the Declaration of Independence

Happy Birthday, America!



On this day that we celebrate America's birthday, we also remember that our freedoms are costly. We remember especially Navy SEAL Michael A. Monsoor, who sacrificed his life to save others in Iraq. In April he was awarded posthumously the Medal of Honor. Nearly every Navy Seal on the West Coast came to his funeral. During the service, as Monsoor's coffin was taken from the hearse to the gravesite, Navy SEALs lined up in two columns and as the coffin passed, each SEAL slapped down the gold Trident from his own uniform, deeply embedding it into Monsoor's wooden coffin.

"The procession went on nearly half an hour," President Bush said during the ceremony awarding the Medal of Honor. "And when it was all over, the simple wooden coffin had become a gold-plated memorial to a hero who will never be forgotten.”

Here is the speech President Bush gave at the White House during the Medal of Honor ceremony:



Thanks, Art.

Thursday, July 03, 2008

Potter Watch: Time Out for Film Update

Finally! We are starting to see signs that we'll be seeing a trailer soon for the next installment of the Harry Potter series of films, The Half Blood Prince. We know things are getting revved up on the Anglican Front, but a dose of Potter from time to time is helpful for holding things loosely. This next film is possibly the most "Shakespearean"in theme and tone of them all - a contrast of romantic comedy and heartbreaking tragedy. Stay tuned. Money is the trailer being in front of the next Batman film - a good sign that Warner Brothers thinks they have another winner. We'll see!

Friday Night at the Cafe: Circa 1975


Surprised? Written by one of the best performer/song-writers of our lifetime, this particular selection peaked back before it all got political and Elton wrote not from a predisposed political agenda, but from the heart. For many of us, that summer of 1975 was a turning point. Mixed in with the Jesus-movement era songs we were singing, and the reruns of Classic Trek we were watching, this was the song always playing in the background somewhere. It's not heard so much any more, now that everyone is liberated and satisfied and pleased with themselves - but back then it spoke to a post-Boomer generation, where the aging 60s slogans were fading on the roadside, just as Dylan predicted. If there was ever a GenX-era anthem, this might be it - ironic as though that may be. But of course, irony is our middle name. And this one's for you, Edward.

Bishop Lee defends initiating lawsuits, vows to "exhaust every possible option" in march to oust Anglicans from their church homes

BB NOTE: By the way, religious freedom was exactly what was exercised when thousands of the laity voted to separate from The Episcopal Church. What Bishop Lee is looking for is sustaining a privileged class standing to corporate institutions over and beyond the liberty of individuals to vote their conscience. The fact remains - if the Diocese of Virginia is hierarchical, why didn't the bishop put all the properties in his name like the real hierarchical churches did? Why - because there would have been a massive revolt, the diocese admitted it in court. Our ancestors did not place limitations on the power of the bishop and a feudalistic institution for nothing. They fought a whole bloody war over it. That Bishop Lee could seriously invoke the Virginia contributions to religious liberty by the likes of Thomas Jefferson - who had no love for the Church of England when he wrote the original draft of the document on religious liberty - is extraordinary. It was precisely aiding to save Virginians from these kind of seizures by institutional ecclesiastical bodies that we are free today. His name is not on the deeds for a reason. He had thirty years to fix it and he didn't.

July 3, 2008

Dear Friends in Christ,

The most recent opinion of the Fairfax Circuit Court, issued last Friday, June 27, is disappointing to many, perhaps most especially the faithful members of our continuing congregations. We must keep the members of these continuing congregations of Epiphany, Oak Hill; The Falls Church, Falls Church; St. Margaret's, Woodbridge; and St. Stephen's, Heathsville ever present in our thoughts and prayers. They represent the long, faithful tradition of Episcopalians in Virginia. The Diocese continues steadfastly to stand by them throughout this complicated, important and regrettably necessary dispute.

The ruling upholding the constitutionality of the Virginia Division Statute threatens all hierarchical churches in Virginia. We continue to believe that hierarchical churches have the First Amendment right to organize themselves without interference from the State. The Diocese of Virginia and the Episcopal Church will exhaust every possible option to correct what I believe to be a profound injustice and injury to America's First Freedom, born here in Virginia.

As my fellow bishops and I prepare for the Lambeth Conference of Bishops, our hearts are heavy at the necessity of this lawsuit, but we remain ever hopeful for the mission and ministry that continue everyday to manifest themselves in the lives of faithful Episcopalians throughout the Diocese. Thank you for your persistent faith, prayers and dedication to living out the Gospel of Jesus Christ both here in Virginia and around the world.

Faithfully yours,

Peter James Lee
Bishop of Virginia

First Thoughts on Gregory Cameron's St Asaph Speech

Very interesting lecture from the Deputy Secretary of the Anglican Communion and former chaplain to Rowan Williams when he was the Archbishop of Wales, Gregory Cameron here (tip of the TinFoil to Ruth Gledhill at The Times). He offers a sweeping view of the history of the Anglican Communion and goes on to assert - in direct opposition to the Episcopal Church assertions in court in Virginia - that we all belong to the same Church:

Canada or in Africa; that Canadians can be elected in New Zealand and New Zealanders in Australia. Even members of the Church in Wales can find themselves appointed to all sorts of bishoprics within the Church of England. I really don't believe that this could happen if there wasn't a very real sense that people felt that essentially Anglicans from all over the world were members of the same Church. In fact, it is interesting to note that of the six Anglican primates in Britain and Ireland, three have Welsh backgrounds, the Primate of All Ireland is English, and the English primates are Welsh and Ugandan.

He also recognizes the darker side of our life together as Anglicans, of what he calls a NATO-style alliance of the Americans. Now, note very carefully - he doesn't differentiate which Americans - with multi-millions dollar assets and trusts, the Episcopal Church is a juggernaut on the financial front. But he doesn't say "The Episcopal Church" now does he? Very interesting - a diplomatic swipe that plays to the insecurity and prejudice of non-Americans, while building up the Global South - where have we heard that before? Suddenly, in one fell swoop, Katharine Jefferts Schori and Bob Duncan are comrades. Now what's wrong with that?

But alongside these ties of friendship - the so-called bonds of affection which have been described as holding the Anglican Communion together – there has lurked an unconscious sense of superiority and dependency: a sense that all the really educated theologians find their homes in Oxbridge, and that all the really big money comes from the United States.

It has been said, with a certain sense of irony, that in the Anglican Communion, the Africans pray, the Americans pay, and the English write all the documents. Put like that the idea is almost laughable, but the dark side to the life of the Anglican Communion is that too often the theological graduates of the seminaries of the NATO alliance do unconsciously adopt an air of educational superiority, while many American church leaders do not even seem to notice, even while they often unconsciously rely upon, the implicit obligations which they place on the recipients of their largesse.


He gives clear background of the phenomenal growth of the Church in the Global South and then writes:

It should not be surprising therefore to discover that the twenty-first century has brought a growing impatience with the cultural and financial dominance of the NATO aspects of Communion life, and with it, a growing critique of the Churches of the West. Not only are we in the West shrinking in numbers unlike the growing Churches of the South; for many critics, the Churches of the West are losing a sense of their identity as they get lulled into the liberalism and relativism which are presumed to be the hallmarks of the modern Western society.


Cameron goes on to point out that development of the "Global South" in the Anglican Communion and the unique challenges the Global South face that western parts of the Anglican Communion have failed to understand in their own prophetic march into the future:

For many in the life of the Communion, therefore, it is high time that the Compass Rose swung away from the West and towards the South. A sign of this growing confidence can be seen in the establishment of the “Global South” as an Anglican Communion network. The network evolved from a series of “South to South Encounters” organised from 1994 onwards to empower the Anglican Churches of the developing nations in their mission and life.

By the time of the Third South to South Encounter held in Cairo in 2005, the Anglican Communion had been hit by the crisis following the election of Bishop Gene Robinson in New Hampshire, and growing controversy about the Blessing of Same Sex Unions. These developments have catalysed the Global South into the powerful lobby that it is today, as they have articulated a clearer and clearer sense that they are the authentic heirs of the Anglican tradition, and upon whom the mantle falls to call the erring Churches of the West to a renewed faithfulness.

Sadly, Cameron then makes a major blunder.

He gives the two sides of the current theological divide equal weight - a major theological and strategic blunder. He has been paying lip service to the Global South, but at the expense of minimizing the real theological and structural breakdown in North America. We are suddenly reminded of this letter.

This lecture was given as if it was from the perspective of someone feigning objectivity - but that is a misnomer. He is a member of the inner ring, a bureaucrat in the Anglican Communion, an institutionalist, we still can't forget about that. Having apparently walked out into the field and accurately describing the lay of the land, he then fails to grasp the theological and political reality in front of him. It's like a general out in the field of the battle stands to address his troops, explain why they are there and then goes on to ask questions about why they are there - as though that is what they are supposed to be doing there. It's an interesting trivia exercise, but it's not
leadership.

Perhaps it's not about leadership - but about shifting the field of play away from Jerusalem or New York, and back to Canterbury.

And the West wonders why the Anglican Communion is failing - here we have a clue. Cameron's solution is the Anglican Covenant at the expense of all the Americans - which again fails to understand that the division is so deep and so profound that agreement on what the word "Christ" means is virtually impossible. It's global - not confined to the boundaries of North America. Does he think that the Church of England laity are asleep, that somehow the COE's decline is a aberration and not a declaration that the spiritual waste land is not spreading through the ranks?

Cameron seems to be claiming ground based on a common intellectual antipathy towards Americans - which again, sounds very familiar.

Add to that the clear understanding we now have from Rowan Williams statement on Monday that he continues to think that the Episcopal Church is not dissolving into heretical teaching - when will that man get out of his Golden Palace and get on a plane and come over and not spend a few weeks lurking about Georgetown University, but rather Pittsburgh? Or Ft. Worth? Or even Northern Virginia? Haven't seen him in court lately.


Cameron is accurate in laying out the problem - and coming from someone so close to the Archbishop of Canterbury, it is heartening. But the result, the appeal that everyone have good British manners is marked with incredulity. It's as though Cameron has arrived at the party an hour before it's ending - it's not over, but it's no where near the beginning. Much of this rhetoric would have been appropriate perhaps ten or fifteen years ago, but to wait until after the consecration of the bishop of New Hampshire to finally - and even then, with much handwringing - accurately portray the reality that there really is a crisis in the Anglican Communion, no really - begs of someone trying to keep the lampshades on the lamps and not on everyone's heads.

Talk is one thing, walk is another. What we saw in Jerusalem was both - we heard the talk, we see the walk. 1,2000 Anglicans making the effort to get into Israel and out is no small task. It was an incredible undertaking that took place in miraculous time and demonstrates deep commitment not only from the bishops and clerical orders, but most especially - from the laity.

It is almost comical - these institutionalists lamenting about "primatial" structures, when it is the laity who are building the structures. The fact that Cameron - while I do laud his accurate overview of the situation and yet lament his appeal to institutionalism - fails to grasp the lay revolution now underway is sad. At the heart he sees the division as cultural far more than theological or the fact that in the West and the South there has been a massive revival amongst the laity that has been going on for thirty years. That revival is now finally finding itself challenging the antiquated structures of the church. The sleeping giant woke up.

A covenant will work if we agree on what the words mean. But we do not. And that is why we are in crisis. If we do not agree on the definitions of the words, how can we agree to a covenant?

In the Episcopal Church the bonds of affection were shattered nationally a long time ago. Rowan could inquire the witness of individuals of when that moment occurred. Those bonds still exist between orthodox Episcopals and the orthodox in the Church of England. It's also clear that the progressive elements in the COE do not come near to the depth of division we find in the Episcopal Church or the Church of Canada - indicating that in fact, the COE is about ten years behind us.

Case in point, Gregory Cameron concludes his speech with these stirring words:

Here is the true pole to which the Compass Rose of the Communion points – not to any North or South or East or West, but to the reality in each heart of the living experience of Christ: a Christ who calls us to be transformed, who calls us to holiness, but who calls us to be profoundly committed to one another, precisely because he is is committed to us.

However, in the Episcopal Church that phrase "experience of Christ" has so many definitions, that we cannot agree even on what the word "Christ" means. I would daresay that the progressives who drop in to the Cafe would have no problem at all with that final paragraph - which is precisely why Cameron- and perhaps the liberalistic leadership of the West - still don't get it.

But perhaps that's not the intent - to "get it," but to refocus the attention away from Jerusalem or New York at the expense of inflamed prejudices and back toward Merry Olde England.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

BabyBluePodcast: A Dramatic Reading





Okay here's the latest BabyBluePodcast, featuring a dramatic reading of an authorized statement from the Presiding Bishop regarding her day-after reaction to the actions in Jerusalem by GAFCON.

You can click on the player above or go to iTunes and download it to your iPod or computer by clicking on the link located in the Cafe's links column to your right. The iTunes Podcast is called BabyBlueOnline. You can also click here or here. Moo.

NOTE: To download the latest version of QuickTime, click here. Also, Firefox or Safari work best. MS Internet Explorer belongs in the Smithsonian next to the TRS80.



1965 England.