Thursday, November 19, 2009

Rowan Williams in Rome speaks on clarifying "first order" and "second order" issues that seperate Canterbury and Rome

via e-mail:
The Archbishop of Canterbury today gave an address in Rome, as the guest of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. The address is part of a symposium being held at the Gregorian University, to celebrate the centenary of the birth of Cardinal Willebrands, the first president of the Council.

The Archbishop says in his introduction:

"Since the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s, the Roman Catholic Church has been involved in a number of dialogues with other churches - including with the Anglican Communion - which have produced a very considerable number of agreed statements. This legacy has been brought together in a recent publication by the Vatican department to promote Christian Unity, whose first President during and after Vatican II, Cardinal Johannes Willebrands, is justly and happily celebrated in today's centenary conference.

Let me give an outline of what I want to say in the half an hour or so available. The strong convergence in these agreements about what the Church of God really is, is very striking. The various agreed statements of the churches stress that the Church is a community, in which human beings are made sons and daughters of God, and reconciled both with God and one another. The Church celebrates this through the sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion in which God acts upon us to transform us 'in communion'. More detailed questions about ordained ministry and other issues have been framed in this context.

Therefore the major question that remains is whether in the light of that depth of agreement the issues that still divide us have the same weight - issues about authority in the Church, about primacy (especially the unique position of the pope), and the relations between the local churches and the universal church in making decisions (about matters like the ordination of women, for instance). Are they theological questions in the same sense as the bigger issues on which there is already clear agreement? And if they are, how exactly is it that they make a difference to our basic understanding of salvation and communion?

But if they are not, why do they still stand in the way of fuller visible unity? Can there, for example, be a model of unity as a communion of churches which have different attitudes to how the papal primacy is expressed?

The central question is whether and how we can properly tell the difference between 'second order' and 'first order' issues. When so very much agreement has been firmly established in first-order matters about the identity and mission of the Church, is it really justifiable to treat other issues as equally vital for its health and integrity?"
Tip of the tinfoil to MW. Full address now online here. From the Irish Times:

THE ARCHBISHOP of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, speaking in Rome last night, appeared to throw down a challenge to the Catholic Church when he suggested that issues which separate Anglicans and Catholics may not be as “fundamentally church-dividing as our Roman Catholic friends generally assume”.

Dr Williams was speaking at a congress in Rome’s Pontifical Gregorian university, called to celebrate the centenary of the birth of Dutch cardinal Johannes Willebrands, the first head of the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian unity.

In the conclusion to his speech, Dr Williams said: “All I have been attempting to say here is that the ecumenical glass is genuinely half-full – and then to ask about the character of the unfinished business between us.

“For many of us who are not Roman Catholics, the question we want to put, in a grateful and fraternal spirit, is whether this unfinished business is as fundamentally church-dividing as our Roman Catholic friends generally assume and maintain.

“And if it isn’t, can we all allow ourselves to be challenged to address the outstanding issues with the same methodological assumptions and the same overall spiritual and sacramental vision that has brought us thus far?”

Making his first visit to Rome since the Holy See last month announced the creation of new ecclesiastical structures with which to welcome disaffected Anglicans into the Catholic Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury acknowledged that he could not ignore recent developments in ecumenical relations.

“Of course, there is the elephant in the room,” he said.

“It is impossible to open up these issues without some brief reference to issues of very immediate interest in the lives of the Anglican and Roman Catholic communions,” he added.

“The current proposals for a Covenant between Anglican provinces represent an effort to create not a centralised decision-making executive but a ‘community of communities’ that can manage to sustain a mutually nourishing and mutually critical life, with all consenting to certain protocols of decision-making together.”

Read it all here.


Anonymous said...

Great story as for me. It would be great to read something more concerning this matter.
BTW look at the design I've made myself Companionship in London

Rolin said...

Rowan Williams would be better served clarifying "first order" and "second order" issues that separate Anglicans from Anglicans.

Andy said...

Rolin, you've made the statement of the day! We need to have a first rate "GI Party" at home before we turn our attentions across the Tiber.

Anonymous said...

Just a small point...One of the few thin gs I got out of Latin class. It's sepArate not sepErate but it's late and I'm too tired to actually do any thinking.
Just being fussy.

Anonymous said...

Another very thoughtful, rational and Christian take on things from the Archbishop. He could not have come to the See of Canterbury at a worse time for the Church, but he continues to impress and grow on me as someone well in tune with the Spirit and of sufficient personal strength and integrity to provide leadership in a fractious, highly politicized Anglican community. Now if we could just get him to stop offering opinions on tax policy. . . .


BabyBlue said...

Actually, Scout, you and I have agreement on this one. :-)


Anonymous said...

I think we agree on almost everything. I know of only one area of disagreement.


Anonymous said...

Intresting aricles you got here.
It will be intresting to find anything more concerning this article.
Thank for giving that information.
With best regards Nikita!
Ukraine Kiev escort