Saturday, March 10, 2007

A Pastoral Letter to the Anglican Communion Network

BB NOTE: We have learned that the intention of this pastoral letter was that it would be made available to the members of the ACN first and then go for wider distribution later. But we have also learned that the progressive blogs have put it up right away, which we here at the cafe are delighted to learn. As we can see in the text in the letter, it is clear that Bishop Duncan speaks to the amazing unity that continues with those who still worship in TEC churches, as well as those who are worship in CANA, AMiA, and other parishes that are under the pastoral protection of Anglican primates in ICON. It is an unexpected surprise to see that this letter is getting such wide distribution on the progressive blogs for it means that it will reach a wider audience - not only the content of the letter, but it's compassionate voice of pastoral wisdom. Our prayers continue for Bishop Duncan and the team at the ACN offices, to the courageous Windsor bishops, as well as to our faithful brothers and sisters in AMiA and ICON and The Episcopal Church. But we also pray for those who are unsure, who don't quite know what this all means, who are questioning and wondering - as we see in the Psalms, the Lord does not discourage our questions, especially when they come from the heart. This is a time to ponder and pray. To God be the glory.

9th March, A.D. 2007
Third Friday of Lent

TO ALL WHO ARE A PART OF THE ANGLICAN COMMUNION NETWORK OR ARE ALLIES IN ITS WELFARE:

Beloved in the Lord,

The Primates’ Meeting in Tanzania considered in great depth the plight “of those congregations and dioceses within the Episcopal Church who have sought alternative pastoral oversight because of their theological differences with their diocesan bishop or with the Presiding Bishop.”(1) The hope of the Primates’ Meeting, in the words of the Archbishop of Canterbury, is that a “sufficiently strong scheme” can be put in place so as to be “sufficient for all dissenting congregations and dioceses to find their home within it.”(2) Another way to say this is to say that a sufficiently strong plan must be found for the congregations and dioceses of the Anglican Communion Network (plus any others from the wider Windsor coalition that may desire similar insulation). The responsibility for developing such a system has been given to the wider coalition of Windsor Bishops who signed on to the “ Camp Allen principles” – a group that includes the Network Bishops – to shape such a system, a system to be led by a Primatial Vicar. (3)

There is much question as to the degree to which the vision for an international Pastoral Council and a domestic Primatial Vicar would leave the Network “within” the Episcopal Church. At the start, one has to say that the eighty-six congregations of the Network’s International Conference ( Uganda, Kenya, So. Cone and Central Africa) are neither under nor within the Episcopal Church, anymore than are the one hundred and forty churches in the Anglican Mission and CANA. Since the Key Recommendations of the Dar es Salaam Meeting anticipated “a place for [AMiA and CANA] within these provisions,” there is envisioned something much different than can be described as “within” the Episcopal Church.

For the hundreds of Network congregations in the Network Dioceses and Convocations, (who claim to be what they have always been, which is the Episcopal Church where they are) I want to share the following assessment. Most of us are at present within the Episcopal Church. This is where the Network was principally called to stand. One can be “within” something and not “under” it. The Network has been proving that for the last three years. The Dar es Salaam Communique and Key Recommendations represent a last attempt at reconciliation in the Anglican Communion and in the Episcopal Church. What the global leadership of the Anglican Communion has proposed is a marital separation. Pastorally, the church recommends such separations because they sometimes bring restoration of right relationship. Both parties are still technically within the marriage.But marital separations never leave one party “under” the other; such an arrangement would be doomed to failure from the start. The words of the Dar es Salaam Communique and Key Recommendations are carefully chosen.Any sense that the Pastoral Council and Primatial Vicar are “under” majority TEC is absent from the documents themselves, would surely doom the vision to failure, and could hardly prove “a sufficiently strong scheme.”

Whether this last effort to reconcile both the Episcopal Church to the Anglican Communion and the two parts of the Episcopal Church to each other can succeed is, in human terms, up to the Network, to the Windsor Bishops, and to the wider House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church. Three things must be said:

1) As Network Moderator, I will do everything I can to bring the hopes of the Primates Meeting to fruition.Necessarily, I will attend the meeting of the House of Bishops about to convene. The Archbishop of Canterbury has asked for “generosity and graciousness” in response to what the Primates have done. I will go in that spirit. Attendance at the meeting of the House of Bishops, however, should not be construed as anything more than doing what the situation requires. It remains that “the theological differences” with the Presiding Bishop and with those Diocesan Bishops who have taught and acted contrary to received Faith and Order (as upheld in the Windsor Report, and the Dromantine and Dar es Salaam Communiques) are of such magnitude that discussion of the issues before us is the limit of our participation in the life of the House of Bishops at the present time. This represents no alteration of the grounds on which most Network Bishops have participated in the House of Bishops since August of 2003.

2) The Windsor Bishops (which includes the Network Bishops) – all those who adopted the Camp Allen principles (4) – will meet shortly after Easter to shape our part of what the Primates’ Meeting has envisioned. Obvious agenda items include discussion about a Primatial Vicar, about a “sufficiently strong” plan for the Network and Windsor minority, and about imagining whether any form of ministry could be designed that would be acceptable to those who have gone out.

3) The House of Bishops will have to respond to us and to the recommendations of the Primates’ Meeting in a vastly different manner than has characterized the majority’s behavior toward us in recent experience. As already stated, the Archbishop of Canterbury has called on all to “approach [the] challenges with a spirit of graciousness and generosity.” (5) Pray toward this end.

From the earliest days, we in the Anglican Communion Network have known that our vocation is to stand for the Faith once delivered to the saints, in submission to the whole Anglican Communion. From the earliest days, we appealed to the Archbishop of Canterbury and to the Primates (6) to make that possible in an increasingly hostile environment here in the United States. Again, the Archbishop and the Primates have heard us. Again, they have spoken. They have determined to give the Episcopal Church one more chance to make it clear about the majority’s intentions vis a vis the teaching of Lambeth I.10, the Windsor Report and the Dromantine Communique.

Most of us, but certainly not all, in the Anglican Communion Network now believe that it is the Episcopal Church majority’s clear and continuing intention to “walk apart” in matters of Faith and Order. Nevertheless, we owe it to our beloved Communion to follow the Primates’ wisdom as to how to take a last step in that discernment. The Primates have established a deadline of September 30th for the Episcopal Church’s entire House of Bishops to make an “unequivocal” response. (7) For all that is ahead, the Anglican Communion Network will continue to work with those “within” and with those who have “gone out” for a biblical, missionary and united future for North American Anglicanism. There can be no turning back from that Godly commitment: the Network’s vision from the beginning. “And since we have this ministry by the mercy of God, we do not lose heart.” [2 Cor. 4:1]

Please continue to pray with fervor for me and for all who lead, as well as for all who are having an especially hard time with yet one more time of waiting and of testing.Your prayers are the vehicles of our Lord’s victory realized in the crises and crosses we face at every level both great and small.

Faithfully in Christ,






Moderator, Anglican Communion Network

NOTES:
(1) Archbishop Rowan Williams, Pastoral Letter to the Primates, 5th March 2007.
(2) Ibid.
(3) Key Recommendations of the Primates, 19th February 2007.
(4) Ibid.
(5) Archbishop Rowan Williams, Pastoral Letter to the Primates, 5th March 2007.
(6) Dissenting Bishops’ Statement, 5th August 2003.
(7) Key Recommendations of the Primates, 19th February 2007.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I believe this was first posted by Rev. Keaton to the HOBD listserv yesterday. The most puzzling aspect is that Bishop Duncan asked that it NOT be released until after sunday of NEXT week. There have been no follow-up comments on the listserv with regard to this letter. Furthermore, none of the blogs have commented on this development. Its as if there has been an embargo on communication of this matter. Harmon and Drell are both members of the HOBD listserv yet they have not posted anything on the matter on their blogs. I am curious to know why there has been nearly 18 hours of silence on this letter. Kudos to babyblue for her courage to post the letter at this time.

Anonymous said...

Seven months to go!
Seven months to freedom!
Seven months to deliverance!

Eddo said...

Mary, I do believe you have been absolutely brainwashed.

Unknown said...

Hmmm ....

Anonymous said...

babyblue,

care to comment on why reasserters have been mum on this letter? It says alot. Essentially, it says we are going to go through the motions knowing that in the end, TEC will walk out. What it doesn't say but is also clear is that ACN & Co. are looking to be the legitimate Anglican representation in North America. This is important yet no one is commenting. How about you? Care to be the first to analyze the document? Thanks

Anonymous said...

Here's one guess on why "reasserters have been mum" - they know it will be easier for SC to follow SanJ OUT of ECUSA with Lawrence as a bishop than without - and this emails says - wait for 6 months then we're all gone for good

I mean, once its clear that AKinola an Orombi are going to be on the Primatial Vicar's council of adivce, and the next set of conditions of ECUSA staying in the communion are a) full complaince to 1.10 (bye bye Gene and Susan...) and b) legally vest Primatial Vicar's church properties into each congregation --- ECUSA will never ever sign that!

I've never understood why Kendall & Matt wasted their time trying to get Lawrence as an ECUSA bishop --- or why on earth Mark wanted to be one, even for only six months --- but this message pretty much says "were outta here" and everybody knows Mark will come too

Unknown said...

The cover e-mail said that it be could be read and/or distributed to all the ACN and ACN Partner churches on Sunday morning and then it will be formally released on Monday. But of course, that was more of a 20th century thing (I can remember that Edmund Browning use to do the same sort of thing, but I don't know if Frank Griswold did as well). Now, with this being the 21st century, that doesn't really work any more like it use to. When it's released, it's released. Alas.

We should remember that there is always correspondence going on that is not released to the public. This pastoral letter, though, is not one of them. I believe that Bishop Duncan, since it is his pastoral letter, wanted it to go to the ACN and partner churches first - but the only way I can think of in this new century to really do something like is not through the written world but through video conference. I am not sure that the Church is quite ready for that, but it is going on. I recall that Bono spoke to the Willow Creek affiliated churches and partners via video conference and so what he said was fresh and new. My guess is those days are coming - it's technically feasible, especially if you do it online, as a webcase.

The PB did try to do it this way with her recent webcast at Trinity Wall Street. But the use of the medium was not well executed (see here.

bb

By the way, these are very good comments - I do enjoy the folks who drop by the cafe. The conversations are always so interesting. I've put another kettle on and cookies are baking in the oven. ;-)

Anonymous said...

babyblue,

I believe that the above comment on Lawrence is right on the money regarding the timing of this release. This will change within the next 36 hours.

Unknown said...

Um - I know this doesn't make fun copy, but I really do think they meant to release it to the public via "old style" before putting it out on the web. But it is interesting to consider "how" it might be read "after" the consents come in or don't come in for Mark Lawrence.

Lawrence's possible defeat though will be a disaster for KJS. Here in Virginia it looks like common sense ruled the day. Virginia is full of institutionalist (which make up the majority) and will do all they can to stay in the Communion. Which may be why TEC filed their own lawsuit against the Virginia Churches (instead of simply joining the Diocese of Virginia's lawsuit) - perhaps they feared that in the end, we Virginians will stick together. I keep praying for that.

bb

Chris said...

Over on TA, the "thinkers" have latched onto the parish and clergy count as being totally unrealistic. Yet, despite solid evidence that the Network parish count is around 800 they refuse to admit there is a problem.

I'm beginning believe we're not dealing with reasonable people here, but an emotionally driven group that uses pseudo-logic and rhetoric to create space to do what they please. The Lawrence case is just an example of how irrational they are becoming.