tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post6809199191113291542..comments2024-03-27T08:46:54.369-04:00Comments on BabyBlueOnline: Diocese of San Joaquin Standing Committee Writes a LetterAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17490745238430648958noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-29690310899820178752008-02-01T23:18:00.000-05:002008-02-01T23:18:00.000-05:00Yes, all very odd ... but WOW what a letter!!!!!!Yes, all very odd ... but WOW what a letter!!!!!!Kevinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00261766465382455822noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-59751275750736488072008-02-01T20:58:00.000-05:002008-02-01T20:58:00.000-05:00So let me see if I have this straight: 1. Dioces...So let me see if I have this straight: <BR/><BR/>1. Diocese of San Joaquin votes to leave, but six members of the standing committee demur. +Schofield ask them to join SC or remain TEC, they opted to stay.<BR/><BR/>2. TEC says they stand behind SJ but do not consider the remaining standing committee TEC and so she summarily dismisses them, despite the fact that they stayed.<BR/><BR/>3. The standing committee points (rightly) that 815 has no authority to dismiss anyone and they are the representatives of TEC and will, presumably, lead the reconstitution of the diocese. <BR/><BR/>BB, where does this fall on the HHHB? <BR/><BR/>I'm not certain, but I think this all may fall into the wise as serpents but gentle as doves category. <BR/><BR/>Regardless, the maneuvering would give Machiavelli a headache. <BR/><BR/>PS: Thanks for all your hard work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com