tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post2214973853061666617..comments2024-03-27T08:46:54.369-04:00Comments on BabyBlueOnline: Georgia Supreme Court rules against Christ Church SavannahAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17490745238430648958noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-77197928445980432212022-01-26T22:26:04.033-05:002022-01-26T22:26:04.033-05:00Thanks for sharing such an interesting article, It...Thanks for sharing such an interesting article, It Is really worthy to read. I have subscribed to you and from now nn I'll check your profile daily for interesting stuffs. Feel free to visit my website; <a href="https://www.betmantoto.pro/" title="토토사이트" rel="nofollow">토토사이트</a> <br /><br />oncasinosite 카지노사이트https://www.blogger.com/profile/07784016991982993287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-70215305754326009402022-01-26T21:49:09.355-05:002022-01-26T21:49:09.355-05:00I simply want to tell you that I am just beginner ...I simply want to tell you that I am just beginner to blogs and certainly enjoyed you’re web page. Almost certainly I’m want to bookmark your site . Feel free to visit my website; <a href="https://www.totosafeguide.com" title="먹튀검증" rel="nofollow">먹튀검증</a><br /><br />casinositewiki 카지노사이트https://www.blogger.com/profile/04991125720013387639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-90977505490529262092011-12-03T19:16:59.467-05:002011-12-03T19:16:59.467-05:00I expect the Episcopal congregation to be gracious...I expect the Episcopal congregation to be gracious and welcoming. I am certain of it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-144461578833749682011-12-02T19:14:17.090-05:002011-12-02T19:14:17.090-05:00December 2, 2011...Christ Church will return to th...December 2, 2011...Christ Church will return to the Episcopal Church. (article in Florida Times-Union)...I am indeed very happy to read this!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-31990253332775134212011-11-24T21:54:41.148-05:002011-11-24T21:54:41.148-05:00Please don't take this as being trollish (whic...Please don't take this as being trollish (which is, of course, a way to make certain some wonder) - but the anon that's the 3rd comment makes me wonder. Is it not time for the ACNA churches to rethink? More than the "we have always wanted to negotiate and TEC won't" position - which may be valid (although there are plenty who will vigorously disagree) - is it not time to rethink what the goal is? Litigation isn't working - and ACNA can complain about being sued - but it's agreeing to participate in the litigation by holding on to the property.<br /><br />I guess I'm saying - is it not time to accept that courts aren't ruling for those who leave, so those who leave must reconsider - in radical terms - where they're being lead, what the goal is, and how best to be faithful stewards?<br /><br />Thanks for listening.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-22990099758824345872011-11-24T14:43:20.033-05:002011-11-24T14:43:20.033-05:00Exactly! I may strongly disagree with the message,...Exactly! I may strongly disagree with the message, as I did with the headline, but I never use profanity or epithets to express my differences. <br />I thought that the use of 'troll" in this case was derogatory and being a bit of an old fogey, I maybe overreacted.<br />Now I'm off to my son's house for dinner with all the family. What could be better than that on this day.<br />Have a gracious Thanksgiving.Johnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-28419852282688937292011-11-24T12:28:33.383-05:002011-11-24T12:28:33.383-05:00It has been my experience that some people have a ...It has been my experience that some people have a very short fuse on these issues and are easily "trolled" (to use Ralph's definition) by remarks that in any other context would be rationally regarded as thought-provoking, unconventional, or non-conformist. There can't be "trolls" in the sense that Ralph uses the term if everyone deals conscientiously with the ideas being exchanged and simply ignores comments that they think are non-substantive. I have seen the term used very loosely to describe commenters who are running against the current of the site or the thread, even though there is nothing particularly impolite or incendiary in the comment. It is a process of countering disparate views with epithets, rather than discussion.<br /><br />ScoutAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-90809133575358824982011-11-24T11:41:46.604-05:002011-11-24T11:41:46.604-05:00The term "troll" is not applied to someo...The term "troll" is not applied to someone who merely disagrees with the majority. Rather it applies to one who uses "charged" terminology with the intent of eliciting an emotional, negative response. Some would add "for the purpose of starting a fight."<br /><br />The reader can decide if that was the intent above. If pies are to be thrown today, toss a pumpkin pie my way.<br /><br />A blessed Thanksgiving to all!!!<br /><br />RalphMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-61719241179473244372011-11-23T22:21:45.143-05:002011-11-23T22:21:45.143-05:00Many thanks, BB. A friend had forwarded it in res...Many thanks, BB. A friend had forwarded it in response to my comment, but I lacked the technical facility to send it on. I think it merits a thorough read. <br /> <br />Happy Thanksgiving.<br /><br />Scout<br /><br />PS for John and Anon 2008: The term "troll" in blogdom means someone with whom a numerical majority of commenters disagree. Without "trolls" the discussions would be mere echoes, and no one would learn anything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-56112664769651815602011-11-23T21:21:42.750-05:002011-11-23T21:21:42.750-05:00Oh dear, it's not even Thanksgiving yet and we...Oh dear, it's not even Thanksgiving yet and we've gotten out the cream pies. Let's remember we're sitting at tables (or up at the Cafe bar) and not throw the food, especially the cream pies.<br /><br />That being said, I did find a link to the ruling, Scout and now have the link at the top of this post. :)<br /><br />bbAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17490745238430648958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-8495536840141329272011-11-23T20:56:03.900-05:002011-11-23T20:56:03.900-05:00I really do object to being called a troll.
My opi...I really do object to being called a troll.<br />My opinion of the Episcopal/Anglican schism is as valid as any other on this site. The church I attend was almost torn apart by all this stupidity. We survived and are growing no thanks to the now Bishop Anderson and his ACNA cohorts.<br />When I see false advertising, such as the headline for this situation in Georgia,I attempt to enlighten without being objectionable.<br />Have a blessed Thanksgiving.Johnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-71829761313754454592011-11-23T20:08:41.045-05:002011-11-23T20:08:41.045-05:00Could it be???
Yep - a Thanksgiving Troll...Could it be???<br /><br />Yep - a Thanksgiving Troll...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-68412865011986610562011-11-23T14:28:47.016-05:002011-11-23T14:28:47.016-05:00Baby Blue. Your headline is ambiguous. Which Chris...Baby Blue. Your headline is ambiguous. Which Christ Church congregation do you refer to? The disenfranchised faithful Episcopalians or the usurping "Anglicans."Johnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-76174623641291771372011-11-22T15:31:23.327-05:002011-11-22T15:31:23.327-05:00Ouch. So the Episcopal Church has won everywhere ...Ouch. So the Episcopal Church has won everywhere but South Carolina? Please tell me there is a new strategy being considered. It's time for a new chapter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-48537798340151017732011-11-22T11:06:24.862-05:002011-11-22T11:06:24.862-05:00Quoth ye press: "In 2003, the 2.1 million mem...Quoth ye press: "In 2003, the 2.1 million member Episcopal Church..."<br /><br />Should be revised to, "In 2003, the <i><b>then</b></i> 2.1 million member Episcopal ChurchAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08057766063907866916noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23327221.post-73320456177574112442011-11-22T06:00:35.868-05:002011-11-22T06:00:35.868-05:00If the post could be amended to provide a link to ...If the post could be amended to provide a link to the decision, it would be helpful and appreciated. <br /><br />ScoutAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com